1 |
Daniel Ostrow wrote the following on 03.10.2006 19:22 : |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Ok...lets try this... |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Gentoo-wiki does not now nor will it ever get linked to from official |
6 |
> Gentoo media, documentation, or anything else within the www.gentoo.org |
7 |
> namespace... |
8 |
> |
9 |
> |
10 |
|
11 |
It seemed to me that although it is hosted in the www.gentoo.org space |
12 |
the GWN isn't official Gentoo stuff. |
13 |
Plus : http://www.gentoo.org/news/en/gwn/20060424-newsletter.xml |
14 |
I can understand the problem with linking to the Wiki but I believe this |
15 |
source of information is not too bad, considered what google returns for |
16 |
gentoo cflags. |
17 |
|
18 |
> It is inherently unreliable and outside of Gentoo's control. It will eat |
19 |
> your dog, kill your cat, club baby seals and make the hole in the O-Zone |
20 |
> layer bigger... |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
I can add a reminder that this is unofficial stuff if it's important to |
24 |
devs, but as stated above I believed content in the GWN should be |
25 |
approved by the GWN people not devs (I remember there were discussions |
26 |
of making GWN official, but I believe it isn't yet). Feel free to sched |
27 |
more light on this for me. |
28 |
|
29 |
Lionel. |
30 |
-- |
31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |