| 1 |
On 05/06/2012 05:47 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: |
| 2 |
> 2012-05-06 02:34:26 hasufell napisał(a): |
| 3 |
>> # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l |
| 4 |
>> 33 |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> I would vote to make this a global useflag: |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I suggest to use separate qt-webkit (or webkit-qt) and webkit-gtk USE flags. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Another possible way to model this kind of relationship would be to us |
| 13 |
REQUIRED_USE to enforce relationships with the qt and gtk flags: |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
REQUIRED_USE="webkit? ( qt ) !webkit? ( !qt ) qt? ( webkit ) !qt? ( |
| 16 |
!webkit )" |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
versus |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
REQUIRED_USE="webkit? ( gtk ) !webkit? ( !gtk ) gtk? ( webkit ) !gtk? ( |
| 21 |
!webkit )" |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
It's pretty awkward with the existing operators, but we could extend the |
| 24 |
REQUIRED_USE syntax to support an equivalent operator in a future EAPI. |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Thanks, |
| 27 |
Zac |
Archives