| 1 |
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 04/04/2010 12:35 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: |
| 3 |
>> You are trying to remove a valid status for a case that has been badly |
| 4 |
>> managed ??? Speaking for gnome herd, afaik, all bugs marked LATER are |
| 5 |
>> for the simple reason they will be done later and no other status would |
| 6 |
>> be fine expect REJECTED maybe, but we don't want to say that to the face |
| 7 |
>> of the reported like this do we ? |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> And why not just keep them open as suggested? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Because often there is no reason whatsoever to keep it open. People |
| 14 |
want a package to be bumped that we *know* has been released, is in |
| 15 |
the overlay (or will end up there soon), and will go into the tree |
| 16 |
with GNOME 2.30. I see no reason whatsoever to keep it open. If we |
| 17 |
start doing that, we'll end up with tons of extra bugs on our hands. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
We already have pages that have the status of bumped packages,[1] so |
| 20 |
we know what needs to be done. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
1. http://dev.gentoo.org/~nirbheek/gnome/2.30/status.html |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
~Nirbheek Chauhan |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team |
Archives