| 1 |
I second these two questions... |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
-----Original Message----- |
| 4 |
From: Dhruba Bandopadhyay [mailto:dhruba@××××××××××××.uk] |
| 5 |
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 7:37 AM |
| 6 |
To: gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 7 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] -pentium4 vs -pentium3 |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Jeff Kowing said: |
| 11 |
> Robert, I was bit by at least one of the problems a while back. It |
| 12 |
> seems that some of the floating point code is not quite right yet for |
| 13 |
> pentium4. I believe this is a gcc and maybe glibc issue. The |
| 14 |
> particular example that caused me problems is the glibc modf() |
| 15 |
> function. See |
| 16 |
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=27211&highlight=python+float |
| 17 |
> for more info and a sample c program that will highlight the problem. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> It was suggested at the time by Nick Jones (see |
| 20 |
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/23056) that I back |
| 21 |
> down to pentium2. I haven't updated my portage recently, so I |
| 22 |
> haven't looked at what the new updated make.conf file suggests but I |
| 23 |
> definitely would follow any advice it gives. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I'm also using P4 and have not faced any problems. Would changing to P3 |
| 26 |
result in any noticeable drop in performance? Also, has gcc 3.2.2 |
| 27 |
compensated for this problem at all in comparison to previous releases? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives