On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:38:18 +0200
Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote:

> Marius Mauch wrote:
> > Ignoring possible semantic issues for the moment,
> 
> Please point them so I could fix them properly ^^

For example all the ordering issues pointed out by others in this
thread. Also the whole 'template' approach is likely going to introduce
a number of issues. And as your proposal is lacking a lot of details
more problems will come up over time.

> > Which in turn either means that the PM has to internally support
> > the SCMs or support some new phase functions to extract the
> > revision.
> 
> After some discussions with dev-zero, I think we'll need a new phase, 
> possibly trigged by maint, before I was thinking about adding it to
> sync.

What exactly do you mean with 'maint'?

> > Plus it has similar (unstated) transition issues as GLEP-54, just
> > avoids a new comparison algorithm and the CPV vs. atom issue.
> 
> Hmm, give me more informations about your concern.

Simply how would you actually introduce this stuff without breaking
existing setups?

Marius
-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list