Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Josh Saddler <nightmorph@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 52 - GLEP 23 revisited
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:38:12
Message-Id: 45117B92.3060005@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 52 - GLEP 23 revisited by Simon Stelling
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Simon Stelling wrote:
5 > Hello all,
6 >
7 > I would like you to share your comments on the attached GLEP with me.
8 >
9 > Thanks in advance!
10
11 While this has a novel approach to the problem (at least, I haven't seen
12 anything else that tries to solve the LICENSE issue this way), the existing GLEP
13 23 really does have a much simpler solution. And in this case, the KISS
14 principle should apply. Rather than adding more stuff to ebuilds or multiple new
15 directories to the user's system, it's a lot easier to just use existing LICENSE
16 info and a single line in make.conf to specify what's allowed.
17
18 'Course, easier and simpler still don't mean that it's been done yet. *shrug*
19 IIRC, the other two alternative package managers have implemented it in some
20 form -- why not take a look at how they did it to see if there are any good
21 technical solutions (or ideas) present. Or maybe offer a bounty of some sort to
22 the first person that comes up with the patch for Portage.
23 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
24 Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
25
26 iD8DBQFFEXuSrsJQqN81j74RAmm5AJ938b0VYR7cylytoJGY3gBi7Uiy7QCgiJjq
27 79oDXSqIrYvL/o7SWxcmotA=
28 =AeFg
29 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
30 --
31 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list