1 |
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
3 |
> Hash: SHA512 |
4 |
> |
5 |
> On 10/08/11 22:45, Matt Turner wrote: |
6 |
>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Markos Chandras |
7 |
>> <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
8 |
>>> On 10/08/2011 02:19 PM, Matt Turner wrote: |
9 |
>>>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Samuli Suominen |
10 |
>>>> <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
11 |
>>>>> # Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> (08 Oct 2011) # |
12 |
>>>>> Fails to compile against system libpng15, bug 356127 # |
13 |
>>>>> Removal in 14 days |
14 |
>>>> |
15 |
>>>> 14 days? |
16 |
>>>> |
17 |
>>>>> media-gfx/pngcrush |
18 |
>>>> |
19 |
>>> We can't really wait forever for slacking maintainers to fix |
20 |
>>> their packages. amd64 is almost ready to have libpng-1.5 stable |
21 |
>>> in the very near future |
22 |
>> |
23 |
>> Two things: |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>> 1) I'm *really* tired of the usage of the word "slacking" on this |
26 |
>> mailing list. If you or someone else wants to pay me to work on |
27 |
>> Gentoo, *then* you can tell me that I'm slacking. Otherwise, I'm a |
28 |
>> volunteer working on things that interest me in my free time. I |
29 |
>> truly do have more important things to do than to figure out how to |
30 |
>> port pngcrush to libpng1.5. Namely, graduate school and midterm |
31 |
>> exams. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> The bug is open since February (9 months). If you can't handle a bug |
34 |
> in 9 months then maybe you should consider stepping down as a |
35 |
> maintainer. Handling does not necessarily mean fixing. Masking could |
36 |
> be an acceptable solution as well. The fact that nobody pays us does |
37 |
> not mean that we can use that as an excuse for lower the QA barrier of |
38 |
> portage tree. If only I got a $1 everytime I hear this "excuse"... |
39 |
|
40 |
Maybe you could check the fucking changelog and see that I added |
41 |
myself as a maintainer in August? |
42 |
|
43 |
Don't ever ask me for anything again. |