| 1 |
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 01:13:06PM +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 1/25/11 12:20 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I would like to upgrade tree-wide policy for EAPI usage in main tree. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I have a great idea for you. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> How about creating a project (possibly a subproject of QA or something |
| 8 |
> else) that would help people do that? In case of no response from |
| 9 |
> maintainers just do your job, and that should get the tree converted |
| 10 |
> more quickly than setting a policy. |
| 11 |
Please don't! QA is way too understaffed. We ain't gonna convert any |
| 12 |
ebuilds. This has nothing to do with QA. Let maintainers handle this |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> My main point is that said "X should be Y" does not automatically make |
| 15 |
> it so. We'd have to think about the migration plan anyway. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Paweł |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
@Tomas, I don't follow. You mean migrate existing ebuilds or use the |
| 20 |
latest EAPI from now on? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Regards, |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Markos Chandras (hwoarang) |
| 25 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 26 |
Key ID: B4AFF2C2 |
| 27 |
Key FP: 660A 0742 84EC 26F1 9EDB F00A FA83 5A15 B4AF F2C2 |
Archives