1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 24/05/12 01:13 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: |
5 |
> On 25 May 2012 03:02, Ralph Sennhauser <sera@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
>> On Thu, 24 May 2012 16:40:02 +0200 Michał Górny |
7 |
>> <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>>> d) Talk with github folks to add our repo as 'mirror'. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> Can we keep the master on Gentoo hardware please. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Definitely. But having a mirror on github will increase |
14 |
> forkability, and will make it much faster for people to get started |
15 |
> on contribution. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> When the user has their tree up to how they want it, they can |
18 |
> either send a pull request to another gentoo dev who also has a |
19 |
> fork on github, or send a link to the commit via some medium ( bug |
20 |
> tracker ? ) , and some dev can just add that as a remote, and |
21 |
> merge/cherry-pick the commits they want.. |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
...is this something we (as the developer base) WANT non-dev's to be |
26 |
able to do?? I would expect we'd want the tree to still be treated as |
27 |
read-only-not-modifyable by the rest of the gentoo/linux community, |
28 |
otherwise we're going to have a rather large mess on our hands |
29 |
(multiple forks of the main tree != a uniform main tree + overlays, |
30 |
the way it does now) |
31 |
|
32 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
33 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
34 |
|
35 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAk++dWAACgkQ2ugaI38ACPBBpAD9EaJsSNXMS6bDbttJStVqghlO |
36 |
Q46xkgPIgunriOLJhDoA/06HH/kgXd/Qrq/Ex0X3kV9nDmYqE0OmiFM1kVTfdVCD |
37 |
=dcOs |
38 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |