1 |
On Saturday 19 April 2003 17:50, Alexander Futasz wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 18 Apr 2003 14:11:48 +0000, Dan Armak wrote: |
3 |
> > I've rewritten cvs.eclass. I'll test all cvs euilds once again now and |
4 |
> > then commit the new eclass and ebuilds if noone objects. Extra testing |
5 |
> > from anyone else welcome. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> > - ECVS_RUNAS, running everything under su to a specified user, does |
8 |
> > not work. I am not sure how well it worked before. In any case it is |
9 |
> > impossible to do in portage's userpriv mode AFAIK, unless the |
10 |
> > administrator gave the portage user the right to su or sudo to that |
11 |
> > user without benig prompted for a password. I may implement this again |
12 |
> > before committing, mostly for non-userpriv mode (especially if people |
13 |
> > ask me to ;-). |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Does that mean ebuilds using the cvs.eclass wont work with userpriv and |
16 |
> usersandbox? |
17 |
|
18 |
No, it only means the special ECVS_RUNAS feature doesn't work with userpriv. |
19 |
|
20 |
This isn't a feature ebuilds use, it's something you can use to make |
21 |
cvs.eclass chown its checked-out files to the user specified via $ECVS_RUNAS. |
22 |
If you don't use it, you don't need to worry. |
23 |
|
24 |
Again, this didn't really work before either, it's just the the eclass claimed |
25 |
it to work :-) |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Dan Armak |
29 |
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE) |
30 |
Matan, Israel |
31 |
Public GPG key: http://cvs.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key |