| 1 |
On Thu, 2003-05-08 at 18:35, Mark Bainter wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I would disagree with this. I have quite a few ebuilds that are in |
| 4 |
> my local portage tree purely so I can run the cvs version of a few |
| 5 |
> appliations and still manage it with portage. It would definately |
| 6 |
> be nice if there was a clean way to handle it within the portage |
| 7 |
> system itself. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
We do not really want to support it officially, as there are no way |
| 11 |
to do proper QA on it. Rather then use a static cvs snapshot, as |
| 12 |
that you can apply patches to, etc. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Martin Schlemmer |
| 18 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer |
| 19 |
Cape Town, South Africa |
Archives