1 |
Victor Ostorga <vostorga@g.o> said: |
2 |
> Lately I have stepeed into bug 216461 "init systems in sys-apps as well |
3 |
> as in sys-process and even app-admin" and was about to moving |
4 |
> sys-process/minit to sys/apps-minit , but stepped into bug 190982 |
5 |
> "move sys-process/{minit,runit} and app-admin/jinit to sys-aps" which |
6 |
> is the same and closed WONTFIX in 2009-08-09 . |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I don't know the history about init systems category, but obviously is |
9 |
> necessary to stablish a category into which init systems should live |
10 |
> happy forever (sys-init ? app-init? foobar?). |
11 |
> |
12 |
|
13 |
i would stick all inits into sys-process - its not crowded in there and |
14 |
"process" fits the init concept well IMHO. |
15 |
|
16 |
generally i thought, we wanted to move stuff out of sys-apps, as its really |
17 |
not a good description of what a package is about. |
18 |
|
19 |
sys-apps/ucspi-tcp and sys-apps/ucspi-ssl could move to net-misc or |
20 |
preferably net-libs. sys-apps/ucspi-proxy to net-proxy. |
21 |
|
22 |
thanks |
23 |
kind regards |
24 |
Thilo |
25 |
|
26 |
> Regards, |
27 |
> |
28 |
> VĂctor. |
29 |
> |