Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thilo Bangert <bangert@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Init systems portage category
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:42:27
Message-Id: 200910130942.22035.bangert@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Init systems portage category by Victor Ostorga
1 Victor Ostorga <vostorga@g.o> said:
2 > Lately I have stepeed into bug 216461 "init systems in sys-apps as well
3 > as in sys-process and even app-admin" and was about to moving
4 > sys-process/minit to sys/apps-minit , but stepped into bug 190982
5 > "move sys-process/{minit,runit} and app-admin/jinit to sys-aps" which
6 > is the same and closed WONTFIX in 2009-08-09 .
7 >
8 > I don't know the history about init systems category, but obviously is
9 > necessary to stablish a category into which init systems should live
10 > happy forever (sys-init ? app-init? foobar?).
11 >
12
13 i would stick all inits into sys-process - its not crowded in there and
14 "process" fits the init concept well IMHO.
15
16 generally i thought, we wanted to move stuff out of sys-apps, as its really
17 not a good description of what a package is about.
18
19 sys-apps/ucspi-tcp and sys-apps/ucspi-ssl could move to net-misc or
20 preferably net-libs. sys-apps/ucspi-proxy to net-proxy.
21
22 thanks
23 kind regards
24 Thilo
25
26 > Regards,
27 >
28 > VĂ­ctor.
29 >

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature