Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Peter Ruskin <aoyu93@×××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild naming policy
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 00:35:11
Message-Id: 200304160135.03508.aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild naming policy by Dave Nellans
1 On Wednesday 16 Apr 2003 01:58, Dave Nellans wrote:
2 > The question then remains is how to determine which package is the
3 > "default" to be installed if you use only the ebuild name. I haven't
4 > poked in the code to see how portage is doing it now, but can see three
5 > possible options. One being alphabetical by category, two being first
6 > come first serve, or three allowing the "most commonly installed" of
7 > the options defined by whomever is maintaining the package(s). The
8 > only downside is that portage/ebuilds will need yet another thing added
9 > to it similar to SLOTS to help support this =/
10
11 Or perhaps better, emerge should fail and print a message like:
12 "There is more than one package with that name. Please use
13 'emerge <category>/<package>.ebuild' for the required package.'"
14
15 Peter
16 --
17 Gentoo-1.4.2.8 Stable. KDE: 3.1.1a Qt: 3.1.2
18 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2200+ 768MB. Kernel: 2.4.20-xfs-r2. GCC 3.2.2
19
20
21 --
22 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild naming policy Jeff Rose <rosejn@××××××××.EDU>