On 12/04/2010 14:22, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> On 12 April 2010 18:49, George Prowse<george.prowse@...>  wrote:
>> On 12/04/2010 14:17, Arun Raghavan wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12 April 2010 18:43, George Prowse<george.prowse@...>    wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> If you are arguing that the name is ambiguous then I think you are wrong.
>>>> Gentoo knows about the unofficial wiki and knows it's mission is to help
>>>> Gentoo and not to hinder it. Gentoo hardly makes a habit of Apple-like
>>>> litigation when trying to protect it's logo.
>>>
>>> I think the argument is that the wiki is not always accurate, and if
>>> perceived as the official documentation, can put is in bad light.
>>>
>> There is *always* a chance of that, official or otherwise
>
> Which the Wiki team should really be addressing before making a
> world-editable wiki.

A simple warning should suffice:

"While the Gentoo community takes a large amount of care to keep the 
wiki's information correct, problems like deprecation of features, 
misinformed users and vandalism can and will always be a problem with 
the wiki format. If you see a problem please feel free to fix it, notify 
a member of the developer team or send an email to wiki@g.o"

Also adding a notice like "Gentoo takes no responsibility for when you 
b0rk your box by setting the wrong CTARGET" somewhere would be good.

Those two should cover all the bases.