| 1 |
On 12/04/2010 14:22, Arun Raghavan wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 12 April 2010 18:49, George Prowse<george.prowse@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 12/04/2010 14:17, Arun Raghavan wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> |
| 5 |
>>> On 12 April 2010 18:43, George Prowse<george.prowse@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 6 |
>>> [...] |
| 7 |
>>>> |
| 8 |
>>>> If you are arguing that the name is ambiguous then I think you are wrong. |
| 9 |
>>>> Gentoo knows about the unofficial wiki and knows it's mission is to help |
| 10 |
>>>> Gentoo and not to hinder it. Gentoo hardly makes a habit of Apple-like |
| 11 |
>>>> litigation when trying to protect it's logo. |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>>> I think the argument is that the wiki is not always accurate, and if |
| 14 |
>>> perceived as the official documentation, can put is in bad light. |
| 15 |
>>> |
| 16 |
>> There is *always* a chance of that, official or otherwise |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Which the Wiki team should really be addressing before making a |
| 19 |
> world-editable wiki. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
A simple warning should suffice: |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
"While the Gentoo community takes a large amount of care to keep the |
| 24 |
wiki's information correct, problems like deprecation of features, |
| 25 |
misinformed users and vandalism can and will always be a problem with |
| 26 |
the wiki format. If you see a problem please feel free to fix it, notify |
| 27 |
a member of the developer team or send an email to wiki@g.o" |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Also adding a notice like "Gentoo takes no responsibility for when you |
| 30 |
b0rk your box by setting the wrong CTARGET" somewhere would be good. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Those two should cover all the bases. |
Archives