| 1 |
On Samstag, 26. Juli 2008, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: |
| 2 |
> > Um, this already is the policy. We've always fixed bug reports about |
| 3 |
> > LDFLAGS being ignored. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Mark Loeser (Halcy0n) (QA project leader) said on 2008-07-24 that this |
| 6 |
> policy doesn't exist. I understand that bug reports about LDFLAGS being |
| 7 |
> ignored are usually fixed, so I ask for the formal enacting of this policy. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Afaik it has always been the way that *sane* LDFLAGS are to be respected, but |
| 10 |
exceptions exist of course and it's up to the maintainer to mangle or clear |
| 11 |
your LDFLAGS, if deemed necessary. I'd like to know, why Mark asked to bring |
| 12 |
this question up here. Shouldn't this be common sense!? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Carsten |
Archives