Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o>
Subject: Re: ebuild laziness and binpkg overhead
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:35:37 +0200
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:24:54 +0200
Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote:

> On 06/15/2012 09:44 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > Every Xfce ebuild in gentoo-x86 is using pkg_setup() for 3
> > variables, DOCS for src_install, PATCHES for src_prepare, and
> > XFCONF for src_configure
> > 
> > No way we will add all 3 phases to every Xfce ebuild since that
> > would defeat the purpose of the xfconf.eclass which is designed so
> > that we cope with 99,0% using just pkg_setup()
> 
> defining a function and call it from the eclass would be impossible?

Sounds like quite a good solution. We may also consider defining
src_setup() in new EAPI. Of course, still going this way we'll end up
with src_phase00(), src_phase40() and so on...

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
References:
ebuild laziness and binpkg overhead
-- Mike Frysinger
Re: ebuild laziness and binpkg overhead
-- Samuli Suominen
Re: ebuild laziness and binpkg overhead
-- Luca Barbato
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: ebuild laziness and binpkg overhead
Next by thread:
Re: ebuild laziness and binpkg overhead
Previous by date:
Re: UEFI secure boot and Gentoo
Next by date:
Re: UEFI secure boot and Gentoo


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.