| 1 |
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:33:12 +0100 |
| 2 |
Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 12 March 2010 16:59, Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Or like the old gtk-1: completely abandon the package and let the |
| 6 |
> > consumers upgrade slowly. IMHO this is the less annoying approach for |
| 7 |
> > everyone. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Abandoned packages do not belong in the portage tree. That's |
| 10 |
> why we have a treecleaners project. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
The treecleaners project is tasked with keeping these packages working, and |
| 13 |
removing them only if there is no other alternative. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
fonts, by design, by neglect |
| 18 |
gcc-porting, for a fact or just for effect |
| 19 |
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
Archives