Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Paul <set@×××××.com>
To: Joachim Blaabjerg <styx@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Copyright
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 02:00:48
Message-Id: 20020814070045.GF4017@squish.home.loc
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Copyright by Joachim Blaabjerg
1 Joachim Blaabjerg <styx@g.o>, on Wed Aug 14, 2002 [08:10:04 AM] said:
2 > On Wednesday 14 August 2002 03:54, Karl Trygve Kalleberg wrote:
3 > > On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Paul wrote:
4 > > > However, I see that the policy seems to be to rip
5 > > > out any reference to my name/email, and slap a Gentoo Copyright
6 > > > on them.
7 > >
8 > > This is plain wrong. Unless you have been contacted and agreed
9 > > specifically to this, the developer has made a boo-boo. Ripping our the
10 > > copyright is stealing.
11 >
12 > Then I might have been the one making a boo-boo.
13 >
14 > Paul; I committed your udftools ebuild the other day, is that the one in
15 > question? What I did was ripping out the "Author:" note in the ebuild and
16 > putting your name in the ChangeLog in stead, there was never any copyright
17 > statement (not that I've seen anyway, please correct me if I'm wrong).
18 >
19 > Here's the ebuild I committed:
20 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=2903
21 >
22 > If that's not what you were referring to, or if I'm just plain wrong, I'm
23 > truely sorry. Gentoo wouldn't be anything without users submitting ebuilds.
24 >
25 > Best Regards,
26
27 Hi Joachim;
28
29 If you have seen my reply to Karl, then you probably see
30 what happened. I asked for a clarification, and I think I got it.
31 I had been relying upon the Bern Convention (implicit copyright
32 for creators) and the apparantly historical Author header in
33 ebuilds. I will include specific copyright declarations in the
34 future.
35
36 Thanks;
37 Paul
38 set@×××××.com