1 |
Joachim Blaabjerg <styx@g.o>, on Wed Aug 14, 2002 [08:10:04 AM] said: |
2 |
> On Wednesday 14 August 2002 03:54, Karl Trygve Kalleberg wrote: |
3 |
> > On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Paul wrote: |
4 |
> > > However, I see that the policy seems to be to rip |
5 |
> > > out any reference to my name/email, and slap a Gentoo Copyright |
6 |
> > > on them. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > This is plain wrong. Unless you have been contacted and agreed |
9 |
> > specifically to this, the developer has made a boo-boo. Ripping our the |
10 |
> > copyright is stealing. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Then I might have been the one making a boo-boo. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Paul; I committed your udftools ebuild the other day, is that the one in |
15 |
> question? What I did was ripping out the "Author:" note in the ebuild and |
16 |
> putting your name in the ChangeLog in stead, there was never any copyright |
17 |
> statement (not that I've seen anyway, please correct me if I'm wrong). |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Here's the ebuild I committed: |
20 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=2903 |
21 |
> |
22 |
> If that's not what you were referring to, or if I'm just plain wrong, I'm |
23 |
> truely sorry. Gentoo wouldn't be anything without users submitting ebuilds. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Best Regards, |
26 |
|
27 |
Hi Joachim; |
28 |
|
29 |
If you have seen my reply to Karl, then you probably see |
30 |
what happened. I asked for a clarification, and I think I got it. |
31 |
I had been relying upon the Bern Convention (implicit copyright |
32 |
for creators) and the apparantly historical Author header in |
33 |
ebuilds. I will include specific copyright declarations in the |
34 |
future. |
35 |
|
36 |
Thanks; |
37 |
Paul |
38 |
set@×××××.com |