| 1 |
On Saturday, October 15, 2011 09:29:54 AM Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:06:03 -0400 |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> "Walter Dnes" <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:14:31AM -0400, Olivier Cr?te wrote |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > > We're imposing our deep integration because it's the only way to |
| 8 |
> > > make a compelling platform that "just works", forcing users to tell |
| 9 |
> > > the computer something the computer already knows is just plain |
| 10 |
> > > lazy and stupid. |
| 11 |
> > > |
| 12 |
> > Eventually, that hits Mac or Windows-like levels of dictating 1 or 2 |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > sets of choices and nothing else. If I wanted Mac or Windows, I'd be |
| 15 |
> > running Mac or Windows. If the developers don't deliberately make my |
| 16 |
> > system break if /usr and /var aren't physically on / (and no |
| 17 |
> > initramfs), I'm willing to do a bit of extra work to configure things |
| 18 |
> > my way. Speaking of tight integration, what happens if Redhat's |
| 19 |
> > employees make udev depend on systemd? |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> And what happens, if GNU folks make GNU userland depend on Hurd? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
They'll finally get to version 1.x and Hurd can be used instead of the Linux |
| 24 |
kernel if someone wants to? :) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Joost |
Archives