On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
> <ciaran.mccreesh@...> wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 00:11:18 -0700
>> Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote:
>>> GLEP 55: On hold pending a concrete requirement for it. GLEP 54 may
>>> be, but that's unclear until it's been revised.
>>
>> Which part of the 'Problem' section in the GLEP didn't you understand?
>> Do you seriously consider not being able to add or change global scope
>> functions in future EAPIs to be a non-issue, or were you ignoring those
>> two bullet points?
>
> I understood both.
>
> As far as could be determined by the members at the meeting there no
> compelling examples in Gentoo who to change or add global scope functions
> in future EAPIs.  As such those problems as stated are not in scope for Gentoo
> because Gentoo is not attempting to do those things at this time.

ugh, s/who//

>
>>
>> --
>> Ciaran McCreesh
>>
>
-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list