Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Mike Auty <ikelos@g.o>
Subject: Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 09:28:16 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Marius Mauch wrote:
| The purpose of this is to keep the system operational after library
| upgrades until all affected packages could be rebuilt and to simplify
| the process, not to avoid the rebuilds.

I couldn't find it mentioned in your email, but if portage is
effectively doing reference counts, what happens when its reference
count gets to 0?  Once no ebuilds rely on the old library is it removed
automatically, or do the "you need to rebuild these" message just go away?

Is there a way to have portage delete the libraries once it's sure
they're no longer necessary?  If so, is that done by rebuilding the
owning package itself, or by editing the owning pacakge's contents and
removing the old library?

Does @preserved-rebuild contain just the affected packages, or the
package containing the old library as well?  (i.e. Does an "emerge
@preserved-rebuild" ensure that the old library will no longer exist on
your system, or not?)

Basically, if I can safely replace "revdep-rebuild" with "emerge
@preserved-rebuild" then I'd be happy to keep it enabled.  If it's going
to leave cruft on the system (or then require manual rebuilds of
packages containing preserved libraries to clear out the cruft) then I'd
personally be inclined to turn it off and stick with revdep-rebuild...

Mike  5:)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkg+aSAACgkQu7rWomwgFXoR2ACeJnf+J/pd/GEEh5Ds/Q80sjOR
vIkAoKEyLD2lTGfehoSoYLP6pH/R++2J
=0sv1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?
-- Marius Mauch
References:
RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?
-- Marius Mauch
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?
Next by thread:
Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?
Previous by date:
Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?
Next by date:
Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.