| 1 |
On Sat, 2004-04-17 at 10:54, John Nilsson wrote: |
| 2 |
> Sorry I should have been more specific. I meant that "-X" explicitly |
| 3 |
> states no X, so a package such as tk should fail because it depends on |
| 4 |
> X. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
...except that -X *doesn't* mean "no X" at all. It means "Don't build |
| 7 |
optional support for X in packages that support it" instead. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
If you don't want X at all, you can't install any packages that require |
| 10 |
it. It is that simple. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-- |
| 13 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 14 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 15 |
Games Team |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Is your power animal a penguin? |
Archives