| 1 |
On 06/14/2012 11:45 PM, Greg KH wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 09:28:10PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: |
| 3 |
>> So, anyone been thinking about this? I have, and it's not pretty. |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> Should I worry about this and how it affects Gentoo, or not worry about |
| 6 |
>> Gentoo right now and just focus on the other issues? |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Minor details like, "do we have a 'company' that can pay Microsoft to |
| 9 |
>> sign our bootloader?" is one aspect from the non-technical side that I've |
| 10 |
>> been wondering about. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Oh, and for those that don't know, I did a lot of UEFI secure boot work |
| 13 |
> in the past at SUSE, and should be soon a member of the UEFI |
| 14 |
> "organization" through my work at the Linux Foundation, so I do have a |
| 15 |
> basic grasp of the issues involved, and have a chance to get changes |
| 16 |
> made, if needed, and possible, to the spec itself. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> greg k-h |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
One of these days I'd like to pick your brain about some hardened UEFI |
| 21 |
interactions I've seen (with pipacs watching). |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) |
Archives