| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 2008.01.27 01:08, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 5 |
> Now that the whole tree has been converted to Manifest2 format we can |
| 6 |
> remove the old digest files from the tree so that it is pure |
| 7 |
> Manifest2 format [1]. Any |
| 8 |
> users who still have a version of portage that doesn't support |
| 9 |
> Manifest2 (less than sys-apps/portage-2.1 or stages prior to 2006.1) |
| 10 |
> will still be able to use a script to generate the old digests if |
| 11 |
> they want to upgrade an old system [2]. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
[snip] |
| 14 |
> If there are no objections then I don't so any reason not to go ahead |
| 15 |
> and add the manifest1_obsolete sometime in the near future. Thoughts? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Zac |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> [1] |
| 20 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html#removal-of-digest- |
| 21 |
> files |
| 22 |
> [2] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/portage/doc/converting- |
| 23 |
> manifest2.xml |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Team, |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
We need to get news items out, on gentoo.org, in the GWN and on the |
| 30 |
forums or everyone with an old portage will be unhappy. Some users will |
| 31 |
still be unhappy anyway but we can point to the news and say we tried |
| 32 |
to tell you. If link [2] will be around for a while, we can us it in an |
| 33 |
mzbot factoid too. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
No objections ... just plenty of publicity. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
- -- |
| 38 |
Regards, |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Roy Bamford |
| 41 |
(NeddySeagoon) a member of |
| 42 |
gentoo-ops |
| 43 |
forum-mods |
| 44 |
treecleaners |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 47 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) |
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
iD8DBQFHnICfTE4/y7nJvasRAjWlAKCowpUt9i1CpdmqD7UyB6DXxzgOcQCg7+k0 |
| 50 |
t4RRbBHMuGSOhySOhmLV2II= |
| 51 |
=PvBz |
| 52 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
-- |
| 55 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives