Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: dev-random@××××.ru
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC Bugzilla interaction guide for devs & editbugs users
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:45:29
Message-Id: 20100907214459.GA11425@laptop
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC Bugzilla interaction guide for devs & editbugs users by "Robin H. Johnson"
1 On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:30:34PM +0000, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
2 > This implies that the upstream is alive enough to fix it.
3 >
4 > I feel it should mean that the bug has been reported to upstream, and
5 > that state is documented in the bug.
6 >
7 > If we keep every upstream bug open instead of closed, we'd have probably
8 > another 2500 open bugs (5312 RESO/UPSTREAM in the history of Gentoo, and
9 > I'm ballparking that 50% aren't actually fixed yet upstream).
10
11 Bug may be a blocker. And marking it as RESOLVED/UPSTREAM you may
12 unblock another bug (e.g. stabilization request) which should be still
13 blocked because there is no fixed package in tree.

Replies