| 1 |
On Monday 03 July 2006 19:49, Nick Devito wrote: |
| 2 |
> Looking at the number of virtualization-related packages (xen, openvz, |
| 3 |
> and related packages) that are in portage, and the increasing complexity |
| 4 |
> of these packages (which means more problems, as usual), I'm suggesting |
| 5 |
> that a Virtualization herd be formed to handle these packages. I was |
| 6 |
> also going to suggest moving virtualization-related things out of |
| 7 |
> app-emulation, since they don't quite fit the bill of "emulation". Maybe |
| 8 |
> QEMU, Bochs, and VMWare would fit, but, not quite. These are the |
| 9 |
> packages that would be affected: |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> * Xen/Xen-tools |
| 12 |
> * QEMU |
| 13 |
> * OpenVZ |
| 14 |
> * Bochs |
| 15 |
> * VMWare (workstation, server, etc) |
| 16 |
> * User-mode Linux |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> ..and the list goes on... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
the packages related to OS-level virtualization (OpenVZ, Linux-VServer) are |
| 21 |
already in the vserver herd |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Just a suggestion :) |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> ~ Nick |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives