| 1 |
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 10:37 +0200, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." escribió: |
| 2 |
> On 6/6/12 10:26 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 3 |
> > After reading: |
| 4 |
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419795 |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > I think that would be interesting to try to not get grep build with pcre |
| 7 |
> > support by default, specially after reading "man grep" and seeing that |
| 8 |
> > its support is tagged as experimental: |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> This is more a reason to mask USE=pcre for grep, rather than taking |
| 11 |
> global action, where pcre may have different meaning or status for other |
| 12 |
> packages. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I thought about that option at first time, but later I checked grep |
| 16 |
ChangeLog and saw "pcre" USE flag was dropped time ago but later readded |
| 17 |
due user request. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> > Also, at least of my systems there are only a few installed packages |
| 20 |
> > with this USE flag and, then, I am unsure about real advantage of having |
| 21 |
> > it enabled by default :-/ |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> This is a possible reason for dropping it, but I'm not sure. What |
| 24 |
> exactly uses it and why? |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Paweł |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
In my laptop, just now, only a few: |
| 30 |
$ equery hasuse pcre |
| 31 |
* Searching for USE flag pcre ... |
| 32 |
[IP-] [ ] app-admin/syslog-ng-3.2.5:0 |
| 33 |
[IP-] [ ] dev-lang/swig-2.0.4-r1:0 |
| 34 |
[IP-] [ ] dev-libs/rasqal-0.9.28:0 |
| 35 |
[IP-] [ ] sys-apps/grep-2.9:0 |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
but running it with "-p" shows me there are a lot that I don't know if |
| 38 |
their support deserves to be enabled by default :( |
Archives