1 |
On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 02:08:01 -0400 |
2 |
Andrew D Kirch <trelane@×××××××.net> wrote: |
3 |
> I've talked with the pkgcore people and they don't use the EAPI's (or |
4 |
> PMS) in the first place. |
5 |
|
6 |
If that were true, which it isn't, then by Council decision pkgcore |
7 |
should have been package.masked. |
8 |
|
9 |
> This essentially leaves you writing documents you're requiring for |
10 |
> paludis support. |
11 |
|
12 |
No, it leaves me writing documents used by Portage, Pkgcore, Paludis |
13 |
and at least two more independent under-development third party package |
14 |
management libraries. |
15 |
|
16 |
> As this seems to be mostly a PM issue, it should be taken elsewhere. |
17 |
|
18 |
This thread is necessary for Portage support for EAPI 3, which is being |
19 |
worked on. It also has considerable developer impact, since depending |
20 |
upon the decisions made, certain existing conventions may no longer |
21 |
apply to EAPI 3 things. |
22 |
|
23 |
Given that your stated intention is for "Paludis to fail", and that |
24 |
"opposing [me] and everything [I] do was an initiative [you] started |
25 |
only after careful consideration", I'll kindly ask you to stop randomly |
26 |
jumping out and flinging turds, since it adds nothing to the discussion |
27 |
at hand and only serves to make it harder for Gentoo to function as a |
28 |
community. |
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
Ciaran McCreesh |