| 1 |
On 06-08-2011 16:36:00 +0100, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 2 |
> I like your proposal but please clarify the following two questions |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> 1) Each package requires a new repository. Who is responsible to create |
| 5 |
> that? Should developers be responsible to do that or they should ping infra? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I would prefer all ebuild devs to be able to create new packages |
| 8 |
(repos), like they can right now. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> 2) Assuming the repository for a new package was created. Who is |
| 11 |
> responsible to include this in the rsync generation file? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
The dev in question that wants it to be added to the rsync tree. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> I think your approach requires centralised administration to ensure |
| 16 |
> minimal incidents in the infrastructure mechanisms. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Absolutely. Typically the rsync generation file is in its own repo, and |
| 19 |
requires as much centralisation as the current CVS tree, or the proposed |
| 20 |
git variant of that tree. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 25 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives