Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: 320095285153-0001@t-online.de (Achim Gottinger)
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug report, Portage question, No sources included
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:15:22
Message-Id: 3A623ABF.C799CE@gottinger.de
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Bug report, Portage question, No sources included by Justin Vander Ziel
1 Justin Vander Ziel wrote:
2
3 > The following were included with a message that I e-mailed directly to
4 > Daniel Robbins and he asked me to post. BUG report in order of
5 > (percieved) importance (Gentoo 1.0rc3 ISO image).
6 > 1. the modprobe line in the modules init file in /etc/rc.d/init.d/
7 > does not
8 > parse the entire line which it should do especially for the alsa-sound
9 >
10 > module. I fixed the line that reads "modprobe ${1}" to read "modprobe
11 > ${*}"
12 > and that seems to have fixed it for me; my alsa-sound modules load
13 > now.
14 > ** this one has already been fixed in the CVS tree by Daniel according
15 > to his response.
16 > 2. dependency check in the alsa-libs package requires kernel
17 > >2.4.0-test11
18 > which will obviously not work with the recommended and included
19 > configuration.
20 > 3. the automount daemon dies as soon as it is loaded.the error message
21 > from /var/log/daemon.log is:
22 > "lookup(file):cannot open parse modules sun
23 > (/usr/lib/autofs//parse_sun.so: cannot open shared object file: no
24 > such file or directory)"
25 > * I was unable to locate the parse_sun.so file anywhere on my system.*
26 > the autofs4 daemon requires the alias "alias autofs autofs4" to be in
27 > the modules.conf according to Jeremy Fitzhardings' readme in the
28 > autofs download page (see http://www.goop.org/~jeremy/autofs ).
29 > However inserting the alias did not fix the above problem for me
30 > assuming for some strange reason that the missing file complaint was
31 > misguided. There is a newer daemon package version
32 > autofs-4.0.0pre9.tar.gz in the above directory which I hope to try
33 > out.Question about Portage, et al.
34 >
35 > This is fixed now !!
36 >
37 > Use autofs-3.1.7-r1.ebuild and it works.
38 >
39 > Bye Achim
40 >
41 > After having read through some comparisons of the various software
42 > management options here http://kitenet.net/~joey/pkg-comp/ , here
43 > http://vip.hpnc.com/~cbbrowne/linuxsysconfig.html and finally in the
44 > freshmeat article I feel like I have at least a general idea of where
45 > Portage is going. I have a couple of questions I am hoping someone in
46 > this list would answer for me* I have a slow dialup connection and I
47 > often download the software I need at work where I have a T1 and
48 > either carry it home on a Syquest 200Mb cartridge or burn a CD for
49 > myself there (which is how I got Gentoo in the first place). I'm not
50 > sure I am ever going to want to rsync my distro because I don't see a
51 > way of determining how long it's going to take without running an
52 > audit of my system. Any suggestions?* What is the difference between
53 > Portage and e-build? Where does one begin and the other start? I'm
54 > familiar with Daniel's article that was posted on IBM about the
55 > e-build system
56 > (http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/bash3.html)* Perhaps
57 > I'm thinking in Microsoft mode here. My question is, is there an
58 > uninstall script ready now for ebuild? The autofs included with rc3
59 > seems to be missing the pars_sun.so library file so I wanted to
60 > uninstall it and install the later version from the source code. I
61 > could list the files from the tbz2 file and do it by hand or I've even
62 > considered writing a script to do it for me but this seems to be a
63 > logical piece of the puzzle that is missing. (is that why this is
64 > called a beta release? B ) From the Digest Jerry A!
65 > <jerry@×××××××.org> wrote:
66 > >Can we please have pcmcia support in the default kernel? It's a real
67 >
68 > >pain having to install off the CD and then build a new kernel, put it
69 > on
70 > >floppy and then move to that to the machine in question. It'll be a
71 > >bigger pain if that laptop ends up being my only working machine.
72 > 8( Unless you're thinking of modules, I think it would be better to
73 > include a few kernel variations and the dd command in the boot cd. I
74 > thought it was odd that this was omitted anyways. I had to create a
75 > boot disk in Windows using rawrite. (well actually, I learned later
76 > that I really was able to install grub from the grub prompt on the CD.
77 > Since I had never used GRUB and always LILO, this business was all new
78 > to me then.) Thomas Flavel <thomasfl@××××××××××××.uk> wrote:
79 > >Glad to see there's finally a mailing list, now I can bug everyone
80 > and
81 > >not just Daniel personally... ;)Ditto for me.>Hmm, I recall asking if
82 > rc3 could have gcc and the kernel source
83 > >available from the boot cd - I see the kernel source code is in the
84 > >packages directory, but I think there may have been a
85 > >mis-communication...Actually I may be looking in the wrong place, but
86 > all that I found in /usr/src/linux were the kernel headers which were
87 > installed with sys.tbz2 - but no source code. Actually, I did not find
88 > source code ANYWHERE which surprised me given the idea behind this
89 > distro to roll your own. Or perhaps I misunderstood and the idea is to
90 > UPDATE with source code?? (See my first question) Or perhaps, even
91 > worse, I'm more of a newbie than I think. >I actually meant that gcc
92 > be executable from boot.img so that a kernel can be compiled directly
93 > from the boot cd
94 > >(onto ramfs presumably, unless you mount anything else) without
95 > having to install anything to a hard disk - I for one would find >this
96 > very useful, and I'm surprised I haven't seen any other distros do
97 > this. This sounds like a logical extension of the Portage system and a
98 > good idea to me, too. Nuff said, perhaps too much. Justin Vander
99 > Zielmailto:zielot@××××××××××.com