1 |
Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 |
> On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 19:41:20 Dale wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> I have a question or two. I don't care if you, or others, reply to this |
5 |
>> with a answer, just think on it. A policy, rule if you will, has been |
6 |
>> decided on by the council. This after MUCH discussion on this list and |
7 |
>> the council hearing both sides of the argument. You, apparently on your |
8 |
>> own or with a few others, have decided to ignore the policy or rule. |
9 |
>> |
10 |
> umm, no, ive done no such thing. try again. |
11 |
> -mike |
12 |
> |
13 |
|
14 |
Let me see if I understand this correctly. Most devs and some users |
15 |
wants things put in the changelog. I don't know if it was you before |
16 |
but in the past someone didn't want to put when versions are removed. |
17 |
That person, whoever it was, said they were not going to do it because |
18 |
it was silly or whatever. This was taken to the council and it was |
19 |
decided that all changes had to be put in the changelog. Now in this |
20 |
thread, about the same thing from my understanding. You said "waste of |
21 |
time" and the policy is not "sane". |
22 |
|
23 |
So, council says it has to be done. You say you won't. Tell me where I |
24 |
missed the point here. |
25 |
|
26 |
Thanks for the reply but I think this is going to be headed back up the |
27 |
food chain again. It appears that either rules mean nothing or they |
28 |
have to be enforced on everyone. The rule makers need to decide this. |
29 |
I suspect the reason this thread has gotten quiet is because it has |
30 |
already been discussed off this list about what is coming next. Just me |
31 |
reading tea leaves here. |
32 |
|
33 |
My advice, follow the rules or get the rules changed. Don't break them |
34 |
tho. It doesn't matter to me if you take that advice or not. Just saying. |
35 |
|
36 |
Dale |
37 |
|
38 |
:-) :-) |