| 1 |
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:12:11 +0200 |
| 2 |
Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> El dom, 15-04-2012 a las 16:02 +0200, Michał Górny escribió: |
| 5 |
> > On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:59:50 +0200 |
| 6 |
> > Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > > I am unsure about validate_desktop_entries() utility. It's |
| 9 |
> > > currently provided by eutils.eclass and only called by |
| 10 |
> > > net-firewall/fwbuilder. Shouldn't this be moved to a "qa" check? |
| 11 |
> > > Current way is pretty useless as it's not used by most of |
| 12 |
> > > packages, and calling it from a lot of eclasses/ebuilds doesn't |
| 13 |
> > > sound me like a good idea. |
| 14 |
> > > |
| 15 |
> > > What do you think? |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > Agreed. It should be in repoman. |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> The check needs to be run over desktop file going to be installed, not |
| 21 |
> sure how repoman can handle it, it looked to me more like a emerge job |
| 22 |
> (like is done with other qa checks run before installation) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Tfu, you're right. It should be in *however portage calls it runtime QA |
| 25 |
thingy* :P. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Best regards, |
| 29 |
Michał Górny |
Archives