1 |
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> Hi, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> As the Gentoo Qt team has announced six months ago, Qt3 is about to be |
5 |
> masked now (see bug 283429). We sent another mail with a timeline at |
6 |
> the end of December. Most of the issues surrounding the mask and |
7 |
> removal of Qt3 have been solved. But we see ourselves confronted with |
8 |
> one remaining issue: MythTV. Its current stable version uses Qt3, but |
9 |
> there is a Qt4 version in testing. In all this time the MythTV |
10 |
> maintainers have not taken any action. |
11 |
|
12 |
Incorrect. You came to me a few months ago and I told you I would not |
13 |
and will not have time to mess with the package at all. I think I've |
14 |
made that clear in past mailing list posts, discussions we've had, and |
15 |
on bugzilla. Many people have spoken up about the situation and time |
16 |
and time again I've said "please, take over the package. It needs to |
17 |
be stabilized and a new unstable bump needs to happen." You took one |
18 |
of those times to create a ticket saying you'd stabilize it, then |
19 |
deferred to me and the arch teams. My response was the arch teams |
20 |
haven't stabilized MythTV in years because none of them have a setup |
21 |
to test it, so please stabilize it. I'm running it on a stable |
22 |
machine. |
23 |
|
24 |
I do not have my Gentoo commit machine up and running right now. I've |
25 |
only got my MythTV machines running x86 and amd64 with MythTV running |
26 |
~arch for a while now. So I ask you once again, PLEASE just mark it |
27 |
stable. SOMEONE. And quit accusing anyone of inaction. |
28 |
|
29 |
As far as the news item goes, as I've said before. Its completely |
30 |
unnecessary since MythTV will handle notifying you properly if you |
31 |
need to do anything to your database. I can count more than a dozen |
32 |
people on Gentoo that have successfully done the conversion without |
33 |
issue. The problem stems from people either not reading the |
34 |
instructions when MythTV tells them they need to take action and read |
35 |
the update guide. Or people stupidly reading the upgrade guide, |
36 |
thinking "oh I'll upgrade my DB early" and upgrading their DB and then |
37 |
running their old version. A news item will probably do more harm than |
38 |
good and will result in a lot of partial corruptions, which we already |
39 |
have one person on the bug you guys made for the news item already |
40 |
doing. |
41 |
|
42 |
-- |
43 |
Doug Goldstein |