Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@g.o>
From: Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o>
Subject: tetex maintainance (RFH?)
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:57:45 +0200
Dear all,

app-text/tetex is currently assigned to tex as maintainer, but, in my
opinion, that's a lie. I have not seen any movement on tetex bugs for a
while.
I have opened a tracker bug (#227443, [1]), if someone feels the
courage of picking it up. I don't have neither the time nor the will to
do it myself.
While it has been stated since more than two years on tetex's homepage
that people should use texlive [2], we still cannot really remove it
from our tree.

What I'm planning to do, if nobody comes to maintain it, is to reassign
its bugs to maintainer-needed and update its metadata.xml to reflect
that.

In case we have someone crazy enough to pick it up, I am of course
available to try to answer any question.


The other option is to p.mask and last rite it, breaking mips and s390
trees, leaving them without tex support at all. This would also
leave arm and sh with only ptex as tex support. Thus that is not really
an option yet, but I suppose there is no point in waiting forever on
this.

Regards,

Alexis.

[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=227443
[2] http://tug.org/teTeX/
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: tetex maintainance (RFH?)
-- Ryan Hill
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
OT: OpenRC - thanks Roy
Next by thread:
Re: tetex maintainance (RFH?)
Previous by date:
Re: Re: Default blank lines for error, elog, einfo, etc
Next by date:
Re: Re: Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2008/2009


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.