| 1 |
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:47:07PM +0200, René 'Necoro' Neumann wrote: |
| 2 |
> 1) Have an implicit restriction, i.e. give them full rights (where |
| 3 |
> "full" just means: everything they need for handling their bugs), but |
| 4 |
> make a policy, that they are only allowed to use this for their |
| 5 |
> packages. In other words: Enforce the correct usage by "legal" ways |
| 6 |
> instead of teachnically. |
| 7 |
We've got this available already. |
| 8 |
The bug to track permissions is here: |
| 9 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=236218 |
| 10 |
Ask the developer who is proxying for you to please file a bug to |
| 11 |
devrel, and they will update that tracking page when they grant you |
| 12 |
editbugs privileges. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> 2) Enforce the restriction technically. I do not know how this could be |
| 15 |
> done in bugzilla - perhaps by having "proxy-herds", i.e. one herd for |
| 16 |
> each proxied package and only give the user the full rights, if a bug is |
| 17 |
> assigned to a herd he is a member of. |
| 18 |
I've wondered before about giving privileges based on the summary line, |
| 19 |
but I haven't given it much thought beyond that. I think that would |
| 20 |
probably be more useful than proxy herds, because 'herds' are just |
| 21 |
actually mail aliases with user accounts in Bugzilla. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> Some sort of "bugzilla quiz" which needs to be taken by the maintainer |
| 24 |
> might be useful in both cases. |
| 25 |
+1 on that idea too. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
| 29 |
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead |
| 30 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
| 31 |
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 |
Archives