Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
On Wednesday 23 November 2011 19:31:11 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> currently we blacklist certain phases (which is largely based on EAPI=0 and
> blocking src_*) for enew{user,group}. moving forward, ferringb suggested
> we invert this into a whitelist of allowed phases.
>
> afaict, the blacklisting + dev documentation has done a good job of
> restricting calls to three places: pkg_{setup,preinst,postinst}. so
> inverting the logic should largely be safe. on the off chance it isn't, i
> think letting the ebuild `die` and getting it fixed up via bug reports is
> acceptable (i grepped through the tree a bit and looked sane).
committed:
http://sources.gentoo.org/eclass/user.eclass?r1=1.10&r2=1.11
-mike
|
| Attachment: |
|
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)
|
|