List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On 28 June 2012 13:03, Matt Turner <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Michał Górny <email@example.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:45:46 +0100
>> Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@...> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 19:43:10 +0200
>>> Pacho Ramos <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> > > It treats -r300 as being newer than -r200, and so will treat "the
>>> > > gtk3 version" or "the jruby version" as being newer versions of
>>> > > "the gtk2 version" or "the ruby 1.8 version", just as it tries to
>>> > > bring in a newer GCC and so on.
>>> > And what problems is that causing for you?
>>> The problem is that there's no way of knowing that -r300 is not "a
>>> newer version" than -r200
> It's actually not though, is it? I think -r300 is simply the same
> thing as -r200 except that it uses gtk3 instead of gtk2.
What it means is that it's the same package and version,
but a 100 revisions of the ebuild later. It makes one wonder
what the heck is going on there...
Ben | yngwin
Gentoo Qt project lead