Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in xfce-base/xfconf: ChangeLog xfconf-4.6.1.ebuild
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:20:20
Message-Id: 20091005232010.1e35360b@snowmobile
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in xfce-base/xfconf: ChangeLog xfconf-4.6.1.ebuild by Jeremy Olexa
1 On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:49:54 -0500
2 Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o> wrote:
3 > Now, with this email I fully expect a reply from /someone/ saying
4 > that "the Gentoo Prefix implementation is just plain wrong" to which,
5 > I am going to silently ignore.
6
7 No, everyone already knows what you're doing wrong, yourself included,
8 so I doubt you'll see anyone bothering to bring that up -- it hasn't
9 made any difference for the past four years, so why would that change
10 now? You probably will see some remarks about "commit it, and let
11 everyone else deal with the mess for years to come" being the
12 long-established Gentoo tradition, however.
13
14 --
15 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies