List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thursday 01 April 2004 06:19, Manuzhai wrote:
> I've been thinking about Gentoo Linux for some time. I first installed
> it a year ago, and I really liked it
> (http://www.manuzhai.nl/weblog/related.keyword/gentoo-linux/). Since
> then, I've installed it on my server and am in the process of getting a
> workable desktop-installation on my workstation. I wonder about this,
> though: do I really need the Portage tree.
> I emerge sync my server about daily and my desktop somewhat irregular,
> and I wonder: why do I have to do this.
What I do is share my /usr/portage via nfs between all my boxes, that way I
only have one copy that has to be synced. This also shares the distfiles
directory so I don't download all distfiles twice (or 6 times in my case).
Then I just set my server up to sync in the middle of the night when I'm
(supposed to be) asleep, and all is well.
> It seems (and I might be wrong
> on this one) that I really only need package names, version numbers and
> dependencies. These could easily be listed in a XML file (per category,
> for example), which means I'd just have to download a few XML files
> every time instead of having to rsync. I think the bandwidth use may be
> equivalent, but mirroring would be a lot simpler and less CPU-intensive
> if you just need to have a couple of XML files and a httpd.
> So rephrasing my question: why do I have to download all these ebuilds
> for software I never use? Just seems silly.
For Sale : http://www.brianandsara.net/temp/forsale.php
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
email@example.com mailing list