Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: James Cloos <cloos@...>
Subject: Re: Re: perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:25:27 -0400
>>>>> "TV" == Torsten Veller <ml-en@...> writes:

TV> * James Cloos <cloos@...>:
>> One change the perl eclasses require is elimination of the code which
>> deletes the man pages.
>> 
>> Deleting the man pages is /extremely/ rude and should not occur.

TV> There was a reason why the man-pages were removed: I think it was
TV> collisions protection and perl people use `perldoc` anyway.

Perl people -- I'm one -- use man(1); given the differences in
usefulness, I cannot imagine why anyone would prefer perldoc(1)
over man(1).

TV> Do we need a patch to avoid collisions? Do you have it ready and tested?

I've never seen any collisions due to installing the man pages.

-JimC
-- 
James Cloos <cloos@...>         OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6


Replies:
Re: perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass
-- Torsten Veller
Re: Re: perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass
-- Michał Górny
References:
perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass
-- Torsten Veller
Re: perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass
-- James Cloos
Re: perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass
-- Torsten Veller
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass
Next by thread:
Re: Re: perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass
Previous by date:
Re: [Gentoo Phoenix] recruitment process
Next by date:
Re: perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.