Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:49:44
Message-Id: 200409211149.37441.pauldv@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? by Joel Konkle-Parker
1 On Tuesday 21 September 2004 06:58, Joel Konkle-Parker wrote:
2 > Joshua J. Berry wrote:
3 > > No, it's not special, but I think most people probably won't want a PATH
4 > > variable that's 10,000 directories long.
5 >
6 > Note that this is also a usability issue. I recently helped a friend set
7 > up Gentoo + KDE (first Linux experience), and the default PATH did not
8 > include the /usr/kde/x.x/bin dir, so he couldn't open KDE progs from the
9 > command line.
10 >
11 > This may be an easy bug or configuration error in /etc/env.d, but the
12 > issue remains that it is easier for all the programs to be located in
13 > /usr/bin.
14
15 The contents of /etc/env.d/47kdepaths-3.3.0 on my computer (automatically
16 installed):
17 PATH=/usr/kde/3.3/bin
18 ROOTPATH=/usr/kde/3.3/sbin:/usr/kde/3.3/bin
19 LDPATH=/usr/kde/3.3/lib
20 CONFIG_PROTECT=/usr/kde/3.3/share/config:/usr/kde/3.3/env:/usr/kde/3.3/shutdown
21
22 Of course this only works after a reboot or env-update and relogin.
23
24 Paul
25
26 --
27 Paul de Vrieze
28 Gentoo Developer
29 Mail: pauldv@g.o
30 Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net