On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 20:00:51 +0100
Fabian Groffen <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 04-01-2012 19:50:24 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:12:18 +0100
> > Ulrich Mueller <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > >>>>> On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Michał Górny wrote:
> > >
> > > >> What mistakes?
> > >
> > > > The mistake of introducing a pointless separation based on a
> > > > rule of thumb which becomes more and more blurry over time, and
> > > > hacking packages just to make it work.
> > >
> > > There's really nothing pointless or blurry about this separation.
> > > The FHS has a nice definition: "The contents of the root
> > > filesystem must be adequate to boot, restore, recover, and/or
> > > repair the system."
> > Why don't we have sshd there then? I don't really feel like
> > repairing remote system without fallback sshd.
> Network isn't typically in that bootlevel. You'd just attach through
> the console (netmgt, ipmi, keyboard/vga) instead.
> > And a compiler. If I mess up some important system component, I'd
> > really use one. And package manager. And backup system libraries...
> Time for your PXE boot from net to just bring back a sane image or so.
My PXE boot from net won't happen because possible /usr-over-NFS relies
on random files from other rootfs, and they just failed to be in sync
between two of my systems.