Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o>
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] About XFCE, renames, eclass, etc
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 21:30:47
Message-Id: 4A9F2C42.8000405@gentoo.org
1 Hello all,
2 You /may/ have noticed some fuzz going on with XFCE lately. Here is a
3 quick outline of what Samuli and myself (mainly him though with my
4 'consulting' =P ) have been doing.
5
6 - pkg renames: We want to match what upstream calls the packages. This
7 includes renaming plugins to $foo-plugin instead of just $foo. But not
8 ALL plugins, again we are only matching what upstream calls them
9 (inclusive of inconsistency by upstream)
10
11 - xfce4.eclass vs xfconf.eclass: xfce4.eclass was basically useless due
12 to upstream changes and it was confusing to users and devs alike. Since
13 this eclass went from useful to people that knew it (before me) to a
14 monster that didn't help anyone (now) it was deprecated. No ebuilds use
15 it now and none should in the future. Use xfconf.eclass now, it was
16 re-written from scratch and went through a few iterations to become the
17 main xfce-related eclass. It is very useful for us, now.
18
19 - xfce-extras meta package: The meta package has left the tree in favor
20 of the renames and ability to allow the user to choose what to install.
21 A meta package /might/ come back in the form of a @set, but not soon.
22 This decision was heavily based on community feedback:
23 http://blog.jolexa.net/2009/08/01/gentoo-how-to-handle-xfce-extras/
24
25 - xfce-config.xml: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xfce-config.xml Josh
26 (nightmorph) updated this, basically an after thought by us so thanks Josh!
27
28 - xfce4-meta : former name xfce-base/xfce4. Renamed to reflect reality.
29 This meta package is the *core* of XFCE, it *only* has in it what is
30 required to run. Thus, returning XFCE to a minimalistic status in Gentoo
31 Linux. This is desired because most XFCE users are looking for a
32 lightweight WM, not a heavy DE. So, users will have to add a terminal,
33 orage, thunar, etc to the world file instead of relying on a meta package.
34
35 - xfce-4.4 was removed. Sorry mips, Samuli gave you time to add your
36 approval to 4.6, but it never happened.
37
38 - Stabilization requests, just bringing the stable tree more up2date and
39 preparing for inclusion into the LiveDVD if desired by the LiveDVD builders.
40
41 Hope that helps anyone that was wondering wtf was going on lately =D
42 -Jeremy

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] About XFCE, renames, eclass, etc Josh Saddler <nightmorph@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] About XFCE, renames, eclass, etc Eray Aslan <eray.aslan@×××××××.tr>