1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
3 |
|
4 |
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:59:29 +0300
|
5 |
Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote:
|
6 |
> >> # Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> (10 Jul 2011) |
7 |
> >> # Dead upstream. Bugs #353788 and #348232 |
8 |
> >> # Alternatives: |
9 |
> >> # net-misc/dibbler |
10 |
> >> # net-misc/dhcp[ipv6] |
11 |
> >> # Masked for removal in 30 days |
12 |
> >> net-misc/dhcpv6 |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > Not cool. For a few reasons: |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > 1. I had to delete significant sections of the ipv6 guide tonight, |
17 |
> > since there's no documentation for these alternatives. Now there's |
18 |
> > nothing on running an ipv6 dhcp server or client. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Which documentation are you referring to? |
21 |
|
22 |
Sorry; meant to include the URI: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ipv6.xml
|
23 |
|
24 |
> dhcpv6 has no stable keywords |
25 |
|
26 |
Really? I thought it did. Then that's something the GDP should have
|
27 |
noticed when we initially added that section to the guide.
|
28 |
|
29 |
> True. I was to request stabilization as well. |
30 |
|
31 |
Thanks.
|
32 |
|
33 |
> I can keep this package in the tree long enough until there is an |
34 |
> alternative documentation available. My point is not to frustrate |
35 |
> users but to "force" them migrate to better alternatives. Moreover, |
36 |
> remember that the dhcpv6 upstream is dead and dhcp[ipv6] is the |
37 |
> official alternative. I don't quite see the point in supporting |
38 |
> dhcpv6 anymore. |
39 |
|
40 |
I don't like the idea of keeping a dead package around, either. My
|
41 |
main issue is that there's no documentation on using ipv6 configs
|
42 |
with net-misc/dhcp, so I have nothing to add to the guide.
|
43 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
44 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
|
45 |
|
46 |
iEYEARECAAYFAk4g0A8ACgkQxPWMzpKk6kO19wCbBQBO9iJlWguLcysqTb5ULLv1
|
47 |
DK4AnjVRCrOWE3eHSuBnPtUOuWmZgCKR
|
48 |
=UTmL
|
49 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |