1 |
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 10:32 +1000, Andrew Ross wrote: |
2 |
> Daniel Ostrow wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > Gentoo-wiki does not now nor will it ever get linked to from official |
5 |
> > Gentoo media, documentation, or anything else within the www.gentoo.org |
6 |
> > namespace... |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Really? |
9 |
> |
10 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/news/en/gwn/20060424-newsletter.xml |
11 |
|
12 |
Umm... it's in the "Gentoo in the press" section, which pretty much |
13 |
guarantees that it isn't something "official" from us. |
14 |
|
15 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/overlays/devguide.xml#doc_chap3 |
16 |
|
17 |
It is listed as one of three resources, with the GWN being listed first. |
18 |
|
19 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/draft/complete/handbook.xml?part=1&chap=6#doc_chap2 |
20 |
> (Yes, it's only a draft, but it still meets your criteria) |
21 |
|
22 |
At this point, I think you're grasping at straws. |
23 |
|
24 |
You point to a place that is specifically designed to mention online |
25 |
collaboration locations such as Gentoo-wiki, and then point out that it |
26 |
mentions Gentoo-wiki. |
27 |
|
28 |
> Mind you, I'm not saying that I agree with linking to Gentoo-wiki - I |
29 |
> just think it's important to point out that your statement is incorrect. |
30 |
|
31 |
Let me simplify what was said before to make it perfectly clear so we |
32 |
can quit with this pointless "discussion". We do not put any form of |
33 |
official documentation on Gentoo-wiki. It is not a Gentoo resource, |
34 |
never has been, and likely, never will be. Pointing out that the wiki |
35 |
just *happens* to also include some information about Gentoo isn't quite |
36 |
the same as telling someone "go here for the definitive answer to your |
37 |
question." Official documentation belongs on our infrastructure. |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
Chris Gianelloni |
41 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
42 |
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams |
43 |
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee |
44 |
Gentoo Foundation |