1 |
El jue, 24-06-2010 a las 17:44 +0200, Christian Faulhammer escribió: |
2 |
> Hi, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>: |
5 |
> > app-office/ledger doesn't have any maintainer and has no stable |
6 |
> > version, also, seems that no other app requires this to be |
7 |
> > stabilized. I would prefer to keep this in testing until a maintainer |
8 |
> > really maintains it downstream, but I am not sure if there is already |
9 |
> > some policy on this :-/ |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Generally it should not be stabilised. But based on common sense |
12 |
> (simple program, no dependencies), you could do it. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> V-Li |
15 |
> |
16 |
|
17 |
OK, I was doubtful because when a package lacks maintainer, maybe it's |
18 |
not fully tested and some bugs could be opened and, then, rarely fixed |
19 |
(as they would be assigned to maintainer-needed). On the other hand, I |
20 |
would hope that preserving those packages in "testing", their users |
21 |
wouldn't expect it to be as "stable" and "properly maintained" as a |
22 |
package marked "stable". |