Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Some ideas on the licensing issue | ||
| Date: | Sat, 09 Jan 2010 20:12:29 | ||
| Message-Id: | 19272.56938.152360.774707@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Some ideas on the licensing issue by "Hanno Böck" |
||
| 1 | >>>>> On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Hanno Böck wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | >> So what do you suggest? Remove "GPL-COMPATIBLE" and move everything |
| 4 | >> into "FSF-APPROVED"? |
| 5 | |
| 6 | > Yeah, I think that's reasonable. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | I've just learned that GLEP 23 explicitly requires GPL-COMPATIBLE to |
| 9 | be present. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | The GLEP would also require a NON-MUST-HAVE-READ group: |
| 12 | "NON-MUST-HAVE-READ licenses are those that don't require manual |
| 13 | acceptance for to be considered legally binding." Whatever that means. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Ulrich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Some ideas on the licensing issue | "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> |