| 1 |
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:36:24 +0000 |
| 2 |
Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:41:02 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > > A major change like this needs more notice than this. The news |
| 7 |
> > > item should give some reasonable notice of the change to give |
| 8 |
> > > people time to get their initramfs setup working and tested |
| 9 |
> > > before it is needed in anger. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > Maybe the ebuild should try to autodetect broken systems and prevent |
| 12 |
> > merge then. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I use an initramfs, it does not mount /usr. The initramfs is embedded |
| 15 |
> in the kernel file. How would the ebuild evaluate that? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
It would just say 'You seem to have separate /usr. Please ensure you |
| 18 |
have a working initramfs which mounts it, and set FOOBARBAZ=yes in your |
| 19 |
make.conf then'. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Best regards, |
| 23 |
Michał Górny |
Archives