1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 2009.05.27 13:46, Ferris McCormick wrote: |
5 |
> On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 20:57 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote: |
6 |
> > This is your friendly reminder! Same bat time (typically the 2nd & |
7 |
> 4th |
8 |
> > Thursdays at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel (#gentoo- |
9 |
> council |
10 |
> @ |
11 |
> > irc.freenode.net) ! |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even |
14 |
> vote |
15 |
> > on, let us know! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo |
16 |
> dev |
17 |
> > list to see. |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > For more info on the Gentoo Council, feel free to browse our |
20 |
> homepage: |
21 |
> > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/ |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > Following is the preliminary meeting agenda. First we'll have to |
25 |
> fill |
26 |
> > the empty spot. After a short upgrade on EAPI-3 implementation we |
27 |
> will |
28 |
> > discuss the removal of old eclasses, followed by our old friend |
29 |
> GLEP |
30 |
> 55. |
31 |
> > If we still have time we can dive into the topic of general EAPI |
32 |
> > development. |
33 |
> > |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Because Piotr recently amended GLEP55 to provide some further |
36 |
> clarification and justification as well as to present a few |
37 |
> alternatives |
38 |
> addressing some objections people have expressed, it seems to me that |
39 |
> the GLEP55 discussion should now go something like this: |
40 |
> |
41 |
> 1. Approve the concept in principle (I think Piotr's examples |
42 |
> sufficiently show the need for something along the lines set out in |
43 |
> the |
44 |
> revised GLEP); |
45 |
> |
46 |
[snip] |
47 |
> > Cheers, |
48 |
> > Tiziano |
49 |
> Regards, |
50 |
> Ferris |
51 |
> -- |
52 |
> Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o> |
53 |
> Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees) |
54 |
> |
55 |
GLEP 55 still confuses the problem and the solution. |
56 |
Adding metadata to the filename is not required and is bad system |
57 |
design practice. Its also the first step on the slippery slope to |
58 |
adding more metadata in the future. |
59 |
|
60 |
Changing the .ebuild extension, to blind existing PMs to new format |
61 |
ebuilds, is probably a good thing as it means we can have both |
62 |
formats in the tree at the same time and not wait a long time (year |
63 |
plus) for users to be on a new package manager. |
64 |
|
65 |
This allows the EAPI to be included within the ebuild where it belongs. |
66 |
|
67 |
That means the EAPI needs to be extracted before the ebuild is sourced, |
68 |
which from the figures bandied about on the list may take marginaly |
69 |
longer but its a price worth paying for a sound system design. |
70 |
Gentoo should not repeat the VHS vs Betamax war. For those who do not |
71 |
remember, VHS was the better marketed but inferior technical solution |
72 |
that won the standards war for domestic Video recorders. |
73 |
|
74 |
The aims of GLEP 55 are good but the proposed implementaion is bad |
75 |
practice, so GLEP 55 should be rejected in its present form. |
76 |
|
77 |
- -- |
78 |
Regards, |
79 |
|
80 |
Roy Bamford |
81 |
(NeddySeagoon) a member of |
82 |
gentoo-ops |
83 |
forum-mods |
84 |
treecleaners |
85 |
trustees |
86 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
87 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) |
88 |
|
89 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkodmr8ACgkQTE4/y7nJvat44gCfWz/XUkodXfh4VuEM6uPrF04/ |
90 |
SzcAoKJKXfKUac/AVZ3/y6ez1XzoG33+ |
91 |
=yVGU |
92 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |