| 1 |
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:49:57 -0600 |
| 2 |
Collins Richey <erichey2@××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> So, then is xterm a resource hog? Aterm looks pretty, I doubt that I |
| 6 |
> could tell the difference in resource consumption. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
karltk 431 0.1 0.5 3412 1476 tty1 S 16:12 0:00 aterm |
| 9 |
root 433 0.4 0.9 5140 2396 pts/4 S 16:12 0:00 xterm |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
It is a well-known fact that xterm is a resource hog. In the above "test", |
| 13 |
xterm has a black background, nothing fancy at all, while aterm runs a |
| 14 |
tinted background (means that the root bitmap is visible as the background |
| 15 |
in aterm, but with a tint. As you can clearly see, the tint color is blue |
| 16 |
;). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Karl T |
Archives